So, if transgender is an "umbrella term"...what's the
need for "trans*"?
Simply put; there shouldn't
be a need for it. However; there is. Transgender is often shortened to
trans and can be interpreted as trans-male or trans-female, and many
gender variant/non-cis identified people feel left out or unsure if their
identity is included and being thought about.
When I see a blog post, article or other written materials
that don’t have the asterisk I wonder if they are including me and those like
me. If I see a support group, brochure about transgender identities or an
advertisement about a presentation that doesn’t use the asterisk I wonder if I’m
welcome in that space.
My understanding is that the asterisk came from internet search
structure. When you add an asterisk to the end of a search term, you’re telling
your computer to search for whatever you typed, plus any characters after. Such
as: trans*-gender, -queer, -sexual, etc. No idea if that’s the truth of the
matter…but that’s the general “mythos” behind where the asterisk came from.
So if you, or your organizations is trying to be open and accessible
by all trans* people; make sure to use the asterisk to verify to all people
that you have taken the time, and intention to invite and welcome all trans*
people.
Sam over at itspronouncedmetrosexual.com posted about this, and created this awesome graphic. Click it to see his take on it. |
0 comments:
Post a Comment